spacer 

Thoughts from the Bridging Media Conference

(Cross-posted from the Strutta blog)

On Saturday, the inaugural Bridging Media Conference took place, bringing together delegates from the worlds of digital media creation, film, broadcast and many other disciplines.

Organized by local digerati darlings Megan Cole and Erica Hargreave and held in the "Hangar" at the Masters of Digital Media program on the Great Northern Way campus, the goal of Bridging Media was to better align the talent and experience of both the broadcast worlds and that of "new media."The discussions throughout the day on the various panels did exactly what they set out to do; ask and answer some of the tough questions related to "Where do we go from here?" In that regard, I would call the day a tremendous success, in my humble opinion. At the close of the day, I was asked what I would like to see done differently next time around. Overall the event was just right in most ways: size, content, format, and the fact that they sevred Vera's burger's for lunch! Yummmy. If there was something that needed changing, it was the diversity of folks in the audience, which I'm quite sure is no fault of the organizers. For an event meant to bridge the gap between the broadcast and online worlds, there seemed to be a noticeable lack of folks from the broadcast side, aside from a few producers who already had a great understanding of web content and how to leverage it. And I'm not afraid to say it- it's the folks from mainstream broadcast who needed the information and discussion the most.

I was invited to sit in on a panel entitled "Monetize, Monetize, Monetize," and prepared myself for a contentious discussion about how the current broadcast/advertising system has been broken by the web, and we need to figure out a better model to support the true value of content on the web. I didn't exactly articulate that point as well as I had hoped (isn't that always the case?) and I was quickly reigned in by the bright and inquisitive audience. Thankfully my brilliant co-presenters had plenty to add about other ways of adding value to various forms of content. And thus concludes my passive apology for spending too much time talking about advertising, when the crowd wanted to know more about ways to continue to make money off of their art.

I'm glad to have attended the Bridging Media Conference, I think it's a great idea that needs a lot more attention and a lot more discussion, so I sincerely hope that the organizers are keen to continue the discussion in subsequent forums. If there was one thing that we accomplished as a group on the weekend it was asking a lot of the right questions and I for one think we should reconvene until we have them all answered.

Bravo, Megan and Erica!

Share and Enjoy:These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • blinkbits
  • BlinkList
  • blogmarks
  • co.mments
  • connotea
  • del.icio.us
  • De.lirio.us
  • digg
  • Fark
  • feedmelinks
  • Furl
  • LinkaGoGo
  • Ma.gnolia
  • NewsVine
  • Netvouz
  • Reddit
  • scuttle
  • Shadows
  • Simpy
  • Smarking
  • Spurl
  • YahooMyWeb

4 Responses to “Thoughts from the Bridging Media Conference”

  1. Categoriesmake money online » Blog Archive » Thoughts from the Bridging Media Conference says:

    […] Read the rest of this great post here […]

  2. CategoriesErica says:

    Thanks for the most complimentary post Jordan! Really quite enjoyed being called a “digerati darling”. That’s definitely a first!

    Two points I’d like to rebut though:

    #1: You have no need to apologize for talking about advertising. It is a model of “monetization” and that is what we were discussing. You did a wonderful job speaking and stimulated discussion which was one of our goals. Thank you!

    #2: “there seemed to be a noticeable lack of folks from the broadcast side, aside from a few producers who already had a great understanding of web content and how to leverage it.” - Knowing a lot of the people that signed up from the broadcast community and being fairly certain there was an even split between the two communities - I just counted - 66 people from the broadcast community and 63 from the digital community (and another 15 people that were either educators or there out of curiosity) - of course there are a few of us in both broadcast and the digital world that have lived in both communities, but that is also a fairly even number on either side. Granted the number of actual broadcasters was low, but there are also a much smaller percentage of broadcasters in total and most are based in Toronto.

    Producers definitely fall into the broadcast community. And one of the broadcast decision makers actually told me at the end of the day that they are looking to us producers to show them which path we should be taking in embracing multi-platforms, which would make us producers and digital experts the decision makers of the future of multi-platform projects.

    That said, Meg and I do still want to involve more broadcasters in the future of “Bridging Media” and involve them more in the conversation.

    Thanks again for being part of the inaugural Bridging Media!

    Erica

  3. CategoriesSome of Your Thoughts on Bridging Media … « Bridging Media says:

    […] “Thoughts from the Bridging Media Conference” Tell Ten Friends […]

  4. CategoriesBridging Media: A Translation of Two Languages « Bridging Media says:

    […] Been enjoying reading everyone’s posts on Bridging Media!  Thank you for taking the time to share your thoughts!  I think one of my favourite quotes was Meg and I being referred to as ‘digirati darlings’ in Jordan Behran’s blog posts.  Never been called a ‘digirati darling’ before!!!  Quite liked it! […]

Leave a Reply